|
Saturday, August 28, 2010 - 8:09 PM
Scaevinus on being arrested by the soldiers began his defence with
the reply that the dagger about which he was accused, had of old been regarded
with a religious sentiment by his ancestors, that it had been kept in his
chamber, and been stolen by a trick of his freedman. He had often, he said,
signed his will without heeding the observance of particular days, and
had previously given presents of money as well as freedom to some of his
slaves, only on this occasion he gave more freely, because, as his means
were now impoverished and his creditors were pressing him, he distrusted
the validity of his will. Certainly his table had always been profusely
furnished, and his life luxurious, such as rigid censors would hardly approve.
As to the bandages for wounds, none had been prepared at his order, but
as all the man's other charges were absurd, he added an accusation in which
he might make himself alike informer and witness.
He backed up his words by an air of resolution. Turning on his
accuser, he denounced him as an infamous and depraved wretch, with so fearless
a voice and look that the information was beginning to collapse, when Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire
was reminded by his wife that Antonious Natalis had had a long secret conversation
with Scaevinus, and that both were Piso's intimate friends.
|
|
| << Navigate to Saturday, August 28, 2010 |
Add New Comment |