|
Friday, July 31, 2009 - 10:05 PM
A Rorschach Cheat Sheet on Wikipedia?
There are tests that have right
answers, which are returned with a number on top in a red circle, and
there are tests with open-ended questions, which provide insight into
the test taker’s mind.
The Rorschach test, a series of 10 inkblot plates created by the
Swiss psychiatrist Hermann Rorschach for his book “Psychodiagnostik,”
published in 1921, is clearly in the second category.
Yet in the last few months, the online encyclopedia Wikipedia has been engulfed in a furious debate involving psychologists
who are angry that the 10 original Rorschach plates are reproduced
online, along with common responses for each. For them, the Wikipedia
page is the equivalent of posting an answer sheet to next year’s SAT.
They are pitted against the overwhelming majority of Wikipedia’s
users, who share the site’s “free culture” ethos, which opposes the
suppression of information that it is legal to publish. (Because the
Rorschach plates were created nearly 90 years ago, they have lost their
copyright protection in the United States.)
“The only winners seem to be those for whom this issue has become
personal, and who see this as a game in which victory means having
their way,” one Wikipedia poster named Faustian wrote on Monday,
adding, “Just don’t pretend you are doing anything other than harming
scientific research.”
What had been a simmering dispute over the reproduction of a single
plate reached new heights in June when James Heilman, an emergency-room
doctor from Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan, posted images of all 10 plates to
the bottom of the article about the test, along with what research had
found to be the most popular responses for each.
“I just wanted to raise the bar — whether one should keep a single
image on Wikipedia seemed absurd to me, so I put all 10 up,” Dr.
Heilman said in an interview. “The debate has exploded from there.”
Psychologists have registered with Wikipedia to argue that the site
is jeopardizing one of the oldest continuously used psychological
assessment tests.
While the plates have appeared on other Web sites, it was not until
they showed up on the popular Wikipedia site that psychologists became
concerned.
“The more test materials are promulgated widely, the more
possibility there is to game it,” said Bruce L. Smith, a psychologist
and president of the International Society of the Rorschach and
Projective Methods, who has posted under the user name SPAdoc. He
quickly added that he did not mean that a coached subject could fool
the person giving the test into making the wrong diagnosis, but rather
“render the results meaningless.”
To psychologists, to render the Rorschach test meaningless would be
a particularly painful development because there has been so much
research conducted — tens of thousands of papers, by Dr. Smith’s
estimate — to try to link a patient’s responses to certain
psychological conditions. Yes, new inkblots could be used, these
advocates concede, but those blots would not have had the research —
“the normative data,” in the language of researchers — that allows the
answers to be put into a larger context.
And, more fundamentally, the psychologists object whenever
diagnostic tools fall into the hands of amateurs who haven’t been
trained to administer them. “Our ethics code that governs the behavior
of psychologists talks about maintaining test security,” Steve J.
Breckler, the executive director for science at the American
Psychological Association, said in an interview. “We wouldn’t be in
favor of putting the plates out where anyone can get hold of them.”
Alvin G. Burstein, a professor emeritus of psychology at the University of Tennessee,
Knoxville, wrote in an e-mail message that his preference was to have
the images removed but that he did not think they would harm the
psychological process.
“The process of making sense of one’s experience,” he wrote, “is
gratifying. To take Rorschach’s test is to make sense of ambiguity in
the context of someone who is interested in how you do that.”
Trudi Finger, a spokeswoman for Hogrefe & Huber Publishing, the
German company that bought an early publisher of Hermann Rorschach’s
book, said in an e-mail message last week: “We are assessing legal
steps against Wikimedia,” referring to the foundation that runs the
Wikipedia sites. Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire
“It is therefore unbelievably reckless and even cynical of
Wikipedia,” she said, “to on one hand point out the concerns and
dangers voiced by recognized scientists and important professional
associations and on the other hand — in the same article — publish the
test material along with supposedly ‘expected responses.’ ”
Mike Godwin, the general counsel at Wikimedia, hardly sounded
concerned, saying he “had to laugh a bit” at the legal and ethical
arguments made in the statement from Hogrefe. Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire
Hogrefe licenses a number of companies in the United States to sell
the plates along with interpretative material. One such distributor,
Western Psychological Services, sells the plates themselves for $110
and a larger kit for $185. Dr. Heilman, the man who originally posted
the material, compared removing the plates to the Chinese government’s
attempt to control information about the Tiananmen massacre. That is,
it is mainly a dispute about control, he said.
“Restricting information for theoretical concerns is not what we
are here to do,” Dr. Heilman said, adding that he was not impressed by
the predictions of harm from those who sought to keep the Rorschach
plates secret. “Show me the evidence,” he said. “I don’t care what a
group of experts says.”
To illustrate his point, Dr. Heilman used the Snellen eye chart,
which begins with a big letter E and is readily available on the
Wikipedia site.
“If someone had previous knowledge of the eye chart,” he said, “you
can go to the car people, and you could recount the chart from memory.
You could get into an accident. Should we take it down from Wikipedia?”
And, Dr. Heilman added, “My dad fooled the doctor that way.”
|